Out of all the bullet points listed for "Message and Purpose" on page 181, which two or three seem most relevant to the goals of your text's author/s? Why?
The two most relevant bullet points in the article from the New York Times are how they express an ideas or opinion and moves the readers to feel in a certain way.
The way that the article reflects on ideas is the total basis of the article. The article is centered upon the idea that jobs that belong in America are coming back to America. THe author shows clear opinion towards bringing the jobs back to the United States and supports the Snapple corporation.
This as well feeds into the idea that the article is trying to sway the readers to feel a certain way. The article appeals to the hard working citizen. By doing that, when bringing up a subject about bring jobs back to the hard working people, it is bound to draw an emotional standing. This article is meant to draw out positive emotion and draw out more calls for the return of jobs to the United States.
Which bullet points do NOT seem relevant to the goals of your text's author/s? Why not?
The piece, although it should does not advocate for change. It is the beginning of a change back to normal american job life. As well as it does not reflect on a topic. The overall idea of the piece is to inform about new jobs coming to America and the idea that jobs are potentially coming back. However, the article doesn't reflect on that idea.
Are there nuances and layers to the message the author(s)/speaker(s) is/are trying to get across? If so, what are they? If not, why not?
In my own personal opinion, I have not seen any hidden layers/messages that the other is trying to get across. There may be no clear reason as to why there is not one. However, It is highly possible that the author's main goal of the article was to me more direct with the audience, as well as trying to drive the reader directly in the direction he wanted them to lean to after reading the article.
| Snapple Tea |
No comments:
Post a Comment